8 comments

  • skyberrys 5 minutes ago
    The tides are really high right now. It's very obvious that the water is much higher than usual. Can't wait until it starts raining on me more than usual too... I'll have extra water from both directions.
  • jacquesm 1 hour ago
    Four days ago.

    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50236455

    This kind of thing will be as regular as clockwork in a few years time. Still there are a lot of people that will simply not believe it.

    • adriand 26 minutes ago
      The deniers have transitioned to doomers. Originally they said we needn’t fight climate change because it wasn’t real. Now that’s it’s undeniable they say we can’t fight climate change because it’s too late.
      • taneq 10 minutes ago
        “We’re going to follow the Four Stage Strategy.”
      • conception 16 minutes ago
        That’s because the ultra wealthy are funding new talking points.
    • echelon 1 hour ago
      The people you think don't believe it do believe it. They use it as a statistic.

      I live in the Southeast and hear the "guns in America kill fewer people than lack of AC in Europe" line all the time.

      The battle is "not my problem", not "that's not happening".

      • jimt1234 1 hour ago
        The line I hear all the time is: "Why do I care if sea levels rise a couple of inches? I don't own a house on the beach!"
        • ctkhn 1 hour ago
          The craziest to me is the people who do own houses on the beach who want the government to bail them out. Even without El Nino or climate change, that's a hazardous location. Do not ask for my insurance or tax dollars to (literally) bail you out!
          • lazide 1 hour ago
            If they might convince some fool to do it, they’d be fools not too eh?

            That’s a lot of money!

  • redanddead 18 minutes ago
    RIP insurance industry
    • Ralfp 16 minutes ago
      Don't worry, most of those plans don't even cover floods.
    • derwiki 10 minutes ago
      [dead]
  • xiaoyu2006 2 hours ago
    I am in OC and newport beach really suffered...
    • gumby 2 hours ago
      A lot of Bay Area folks thought they were immune
  • bilsbie 1 hour ago
    This is more likely to be climate change related. It’s climate denial to try blaming it on El Niño.
    • tmnvix 1 hour ago
      I think a common view is that the strength (and possibly frequency?) of El Niño is a symptom of climate change.
      • czinck 19 minutes ago
        Yes, several studies have concluded that climate change is making both El Niño and La Niña stronger, and making the switch between them quicker. And "stronger" here just means the temperature difference. Climate change is also raising the baseline temperature, so the actual effects of an El Niño of a given temperature difference (which this year is already the biggest on record and climbing) is expected to be worse.
    • georgemcbay 1 hour ago
      > This is more likely to be climate change related. It’s climate denial to try blaming it on El Niño.

      It is entirely related to both and I'm pretty sure Gizmodo isn't trying to project blame away from climate change here.

      Climate change is making unusually adverse weather events more common in general. El Niño is a cyclical event that results in an increase in adverse weather events from whatever the current baseline is.

      As climate change worsens things on average, it'll worsen things even more when combined with amplification events like El Niño.

  • remusrm 10 minutes ago
    [dead]
  • tiotempestade 2 hours ago
    [flagged]
    • echelon 1 hour ago
      Citizens vote for what speaks to their daily lives and fears. Not necessarily academic ideas or concepts.

      They'll vote out of pain more readily than out of conscience.

      • fnordian_slip 42 minutes ago
        How has that pain been alleviated by the current administration?

        From the outside, it looks like the motivation of these voters was mainly to cause pain to perceived enemies. From my point of view, this is no longer just the effects of the two Santas strategy, this feels like it goes way beyond that.

        Ninja-edit: Is it ok to discuss under deleted comments? If not just delete this.

  • rationalist 1 hour ago
    I remember when Gizmodo just posted cool technology stuff. I even had my stuff featured on their website a couple of times.

    Edit: I haven't been on Gizmodo for a long time. Do they also have a rule saying you can't criticize them?

    This inspired me to checkout Hackaday again. Thankfully they still just post cool tech stuff (even after they sold the website a few years back). I'm not cool enough to have my stuff featured on HAD though lol.

    • dghlsakjg 31 minutes ago
      Like so much in today’s world, this is kinda Peter thiel’s fault.

      He bankrolled the Hulk Hogan lawsuit against Gawker as revenge because they reported on him being gay. The judgement forced gawker into bankruptcy where it was scooped up by private equity. The new managers gutted the place and forced the writers and editors to publish clickbait garbage instead of doing journalism.

      That’s why Gizmodo looks nothing like what you remember.

      • justinhj 16 minutes ago
        Journalism like publishing private sexual encounters that were secretly recorded and called it news?
    • Aachen 18 minutes ago
      I didn't vote on your comment but consider that people might just find the comment nonconstructive or uninteresting (which is what the guidelines say to base votes on) rather than that there is a "rule against criticising Gizmodo"